These levels define public conformance vocabulary for implementations that cite, align with, implement, self-declare against, or obtain official certification for the Sigma Runtime Standard.
The implementation cites, discusses, or uses concepts from SRS/SRIP but does not claim technical conformance.
Attribution link and version reference.
Any third party following the attribution requirements.
No.
The implementation intentionally follows selected public SRS/SRIP concepts or requirements but does not claim complete conformance.
SRS/SRIP version reference, supported requirement list, unsupported requirement list, and known deviation summary.
Any third party with public or reviewable evidence.
No for truthful self-declaration. Yes for official certification or badge use.
The implementation satisfies a documented subset of public SRS/SRIP normative requirements and identifies unsupported or incomplete areas.
Version-pinned requirement matrix, supported SRIPs, unsupported SRIPs, known deviations, and evidence artifacts.
Any third party following the self-declaration policy.
No for self-declaration. Yes for official certification or registry listing.
The implementation satisfies the minimum required public SRS/SRIP requirements for a declared scope and version.
Version-pinned minimum requirement matrix, test evidence, unsupported SRIPs, known deviations, and implementation scope.
Any third party following the self-declaration policy with sufficient evidence.
No for self-declaration. Yes for official certification or badge use.
The implementation claims complete coverage of applicable public SRS/SRIP normative requirements for a specified version and scope.
Complete version-pinned requirement matrix, supported SRIPs, unsupported SRIPs if excluded by scope, known deviations, test artifacts, implementation scope, and reproducible evidence references.
Any third party may make a truthful self-declaration with complete evidence. Official certification requires Sigma review.
No for self-declared wording. Yes for official certification, badge use, or registry listing.
The implementation has completed an official Sigma certification review for a specified version, scope, and level.
Certification record, review scope, approved evidence artifacts, registry entry, and badge authorization where applicable.
Only implementations reviewed, approved, and listed by Sigma Stratum.
Yes.
The implementation has completed an official Sigma enterprise certification review covering enterprise deployment, support, governance, and operational requirements in addition to technical conformance.
Enterprise certification record, technical evidence, governance evidence, deployment scope, support or operational evidence, registry entry, and badge authorization where applicable.
Only implementations reviewed, approved, and listed by Sigma Stratum for enterprise certification.
Yes.